Is “Offshore” Another Word for Corruption?
Offshore investments often carry a negative connotation, but the reality is far more nuanced. Contrary to popular belief, most offshore activities are entirely legal and serve legitimate purposes. Media coverage tends to sensationalize the idea of offshore investments as synonymous with corruption. The truth is that these financial arrangements are often practical, necessary, and above all, legal.
Understanding the concept of legitimate offshore investments is crucial. It helps differentiate between lawful, prudent financial strategies and the misuse of these structures for illegal activities.
Headlines and Misconceptions
In early November 2020, headlines once again shone a spotlight on the offshore world: “Arrest warrants issued for founders of Panama Papers firm.” As reported by Yahoo News and other outlets, Germany issued international arrest warrants for the founders of the law firm at the center of the “Panama Papers” data leak, which first emerged in 2016.
Back then, headlines describing the Panama Papers leak were similarly sensationalistic:
-
“Giant Leak of Offshore Financial Records Exposes Global Array of Crime and Corruption”
-
“Massive Leak Reveals the Global Elite’s Secret Cash Havens”
-
“Inside the Firm that Helps the Super-Rich Hide Their Money”
These headlines painted a picture of widespread illegality and corruption. However, the reality is far different. We observed at the time that this massive data leak actually proved that more than 99% of offshore investments were perfectly legal and logical under the unique circumstances of the clients who made them. According to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), which coordinated the review of the leaked documents, more than 214,000 offshore entities appeared in the leak. Yet only a handful of them were tied to any wrongdoing.
A more accurate headline would have been, “Panama Papers Proves Most Offshore Investments Are Legal.” But, of course, headlines like that don’t attract as much attention as more sensationalistic ones. [For more information, read: “Panama Papers Analysis: Offshore Truth Unveiled.”]
Why Offshore Investments Are Legal
These facts are easily overlooked in the hyper-politicized posturing over anything even remotely connected to the offshore world. And similar rhetoric is likely to continue as more leaks emerge, such as “The FinCEN Files” exposed by Buzzfeed News. These documents reveal how the “giants of Western banking move trillions of dollars in suspicious transactions, enriching themselves and their shareholders while facilitating the work of terrorists, kleptocrats, and drug kingpins.”
The FinCEN Files consist of thousands of documents leaked by a whistleblower inside the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). FinCEN is a secretive bureau within the U.S. Treasury Department. It is responsible for processing suspicious activity reports submitted by American banks and other financial institutions.
But again, this narrative is not new. The United States has long been one of the most accommodating places in the world for money laundering. In 2012, the Department of Justice (DOJ) quietly announced that banking giant HSBC had agreed to pay a $1.9 billion fine. HSBC also admitted that it had inadequate compliance and anti-money laundering controls in place. This fine represented about a month’s worth of profits for the bank. No one at HSBC faced criminal prosecution for these activities. The bank was indeed, as some pundits remarked, “too big to jail.”
Another too-big-to-jail bank is Standard Chartered Bank. In 2012, it entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the DOJ. The agreement acknowledged a deliberate, widespread, and years-long conspiracy “to engage in transactions with entities associated with sanctioned countries, including Iran, Sudan, Libya, and Burma” involving at least $227 million. But neither Standard Chartered nor its executives faced criminal penalties. Instead, the bank agreed to forfeit $227 million, or about two weeks of profits for the bank.
Common Objections and Responses
Critics often argue that offshore investments are a tool for tax evasion, criminal activity, or unethical behavior. However, the evidence suggests otherwise:
-
Most Offshore Activities are Legal: The majority of offshore investments are perfectly legal. They serve legitimate purposes like tax planning, asset protection, and ensuring investment continuity.
-
Ethical Concerns: While it’s true that offshore structures can be abused, the misuse of these tools is not inherent to their nature. Offshore investments, like any financial instrument, can be used responsibly or irresponsibly. The key is regulation and compliance, not outright condemnation.
-
Regulations are in Place: There are strict regulations and reporting requirements for offshore investments. Laws like the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and the OECD’s Common Reporting Standard (CRS) are designed to ensure transparency and prevent illicit activities. These frameworks demonstrate a commitment to lawful, ethical financial practices.
The Benefits of Going Offshore
Offshore investments often carry a stigma due to sensational headlines. But there are many legitimate reasons to use offshore companies and trusts.
-
Buying Real Estate in Another Country: Many nations, such as Mexico, prohibit foreigners from holding property in their own name in certain areas of the country. Using a Mexican trust (called a fideicomiso) overcomes this obstacle. [Find more information here on buying property in Mexico.]
-
Avoiding Probate Formalities: Many countries, especially those with a “civil law” tradition (e.g., Spanish-speaking countries), require assets held in your own name to go through a time-consuming and expensive probate process. Panama is a notorious example, with probate formalities extending for months or years and often eating up 10% or more of the value of the property being transferred to the next generation. Using a Panamanian foundation legally avoids this nightmare.
-
International Tax Planning: While some may view using offshore entities to reduce taxes as morally questionable, it is perfectly legal. Multinational corporations like Apple and Google have dramatically reduced their tax burdens using these strategies. Indeed, companies have a fiduciary duty to their shareholders not to pay more in taxes than legally required.
-
Asset Protection Planning: Multi-million-dollar judgments are commonplace in the “land of the free.” It’s only prudent for American doctors, entrepreneurs, and others who have accumulated wealth for retirement to place a portion of their nest-egg assets offshore. In many cases, these arrangements involve international companies and/or trusts.
Additional Reasons to Consider Offshore Investments
-
Investment Continuity: The attacks of September 11, 2001, demonstrated the vulnerability of the US financial infrastructure. US securities markets were closed for four days after the attack. During that time, US investors with only domestic bank or brokerage accounts couldn’t trade. But US investors with foreign accounts could trade foreign securities on foreign exchanges.
-
An Investment Lifeline: Offshore investments can be a lifesaver for individuals and families threatened by persecution or totalitarian governments. Technological innovation has made it easier for governments to monitor financial dealings. Offshore investments provide a layer of protection if the worst happens.
-
Reduced Portfolio Risk: Globally diversified investment portfolios carry significantly less long-term risk than those concentrated in only one market. Investment risk is diversified across different securities markets, currencies, and legal systems. A study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas demonstrates that a portfolio with 20% non-US stocks would have experienced both higher returns and lower volatility than a portfolio consisting of US stocks alone.
Due Diligence and Compliance
It’s crucial to conduct due diligence on any foreign investments you’re considering. If you’re interested in buying foreign real estate, for example, hire a lawyer to ensure that the seller actually owns the property and that no third party has made a legal challenge to it. If you’re buying precious metals, deal only with recognized dealers that can prove that you have legal title to the metals you’ve purchased. And if you’re opening an offshore bank account, review the annual report to ensure that the bank is well-capitalized.
Be certain that you understand your tax and reporting obligations when you invest internationally. International real estate holdings and precious metals you have direct control over (e.g., in a safe deposit box) are non-reportable. But most international account relationships are reportable.
Offshore is Not a Dirty Word
The bottom line is that despite the anti-offshore frenzy orchestrated by the media and government, it’s perfectly legal to invest and do business internationally. In many cases, an offshore company or trust can make it easier and more efficient to do so.
Finally, don’t be paralyzed by fear of social disapproval when you start your offshore journey. The only money you stand to lose is your own.
Need Help?
Since 1984, we’ve helped more than 15,000 customers and clients protect their wealth using proven, low-risk domestic and offshore planning. To see if our planning is right for you, please book in a free no-obligation call with one of our associates. You can do that here.
